Xinjiang's New Counties: Strategic Expansion or Diplomatic Chess Move?

By IndraStra Global Editorial Team

Cover Image Attribute: The file photo PLA's Tianshuihai Army Service Station Signage in the disputed territory of Aksai Chin. GPS location: 35° 20′ 58.09″ N, 79° 32′ 13.78″ E / Source: Flickr

On December 27, 2024, China's Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (新疆维吾尔自治区) announced the creation of two new counties: He'an County and Hekang County, both under the jurisdiction of Hotan Prefecture in the southern part of the region.  According to official statements, the county seat of He'an is located in Hongliu Township, while Hekang's administrative center is in Xeyidula Township. 
Establishing these new counties seems to be part of China's ongoing administrative restructuring to improve governance and development in the vast and diverse Xinjiang region; however, concerns remain over increased surveillance and tighter control over the Uyghur population. On the other hand, this initiative could have a couple of additional angles, including significant mineral resources and strategic military importance.
If we consider these additional angles, this development will surely spark discussions about its potential implications for border negotiations with India, particularly regarding the contentious Aksai Chin region, which spans approximately 38,000 square kilometers (14,700 square miles) and was captured by China during the Sino-Indian War of 1962. Many see this as a potential indication of a more assertive Chinese approach to consolidating its regional territorial claims.

Strategically, creating these counties near the disputed border seems to be a deliberate effort to reinforce China’s de facto control over Aksai Chin. This action aligns with the advanced stages of the "salami slicing" strategy, where incremental steps are taken to gain control without triggering direct conflict. The process typically begins with symbolic gestures, such as publishing maps, making public sovereignty claims, or issuing official statements about contested territories. In the second phase, physical presence is established through personnel deployment, road construction, and the creation of small military outposts.

The third phase consolidates control by setting up administrative structures like counties, townships, and governance units. The fourth stage integrates these regions into China’s national framework, including military expansions, resource exploitation, and economic development. Finally, in the fifth stage, China leverages its established administrative presence and physical control to bolster its position in international negotiations, presenting the region as entirely governed and an indisputable part of its territory.

Diplomatically, it's pretty clear that this recent development could severely complicate ongoing border negotiations between the two countries, as mentioned earlier in the article. India might perceive this move as a unilateral assertion of control, undermining the spirit of continuing border talks to resolve disputes. The timing and unilateral nature of this move also suggest a deliberate attempt to alter the status quo, making it harder for India to assert its claims in the future. Also, it could lead to a hardening of India's stance in negotiations, possibly resulting in a prolonged diplomatic standoff. Moreover, the international community may view this as a textbook example of China’s broader pattern of aggressive territorial expansion, damaging its global reputation and complicating its relations with other neighboring countries.

But, the military implications of this administrative expansion should not be underestimated. He’an County's location near the G219 highway, a critical logistical route for Chinese military operations in the region, underscores the strategic nature of this decision. Control over this highway enables faster troop movement and supply chain efficiency, enhancing China’s readiness in the event of conflict. This could compel India to strengthen its own military posture along the border, potentially triggering an arms race in the region. Increased militarization could escalate tensions further, raising the risk of miscalculations and unintended skirmishes, as seen in previous border clashes.

Economically, the expansion carries significant implications, given the region's potential lithium deposits. By tightening administrative control over these areas, China could be positioning itself to exploit these valuable resources, further complicating the dispute. Resource control could become a new dimension in the negotiations, with India seeing this as an attempt to secure economic leverage over contested territories. Such actions may also fuel India’s push to explore and secure its own resources in the region, intensifying competition and adding another layer of complexity to the already strained bilateral relations. 

While the impact on border discussions with India is substantial, assuming this development will inevitably escalate tensions or derail negotiations may oversimplify the situation. Both nations have historically demonstrated strategic patience, indicating that the future may not unfold as directly or confrontationally as some narratives suggest.

Ultimately, does establishing these new counties alter geopolitical dynamics? Does this represent outright territorial aggression, or is it a more nuanced combination of administrative and strategic considerations? Answers to these questions and their true implications for Sino-Indian relations will only become apparent with time. Still, it is essential to approach this complex interplay of diplomacy and strategy with caution and avoid overly simplistic interpretations.

IndraStra Global is now available on
Apple News, Google News, Feedly, Flipboard, and  WhatsApp Channel

COPYRIGHT: This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

REPUBLISH: Republish our articles online or in print for free if you follow these guidelines. https://www.indrastra.com/p/republish-us.html