Vietnam’s 8% Growth Has a Domestic Ownership Problem

Vietnam’s 8% growth is real, but the gap between FDI-led expansion and domestic SMEs raises questions about ownership and productivity.

 Vietnam’s economy expanded by 8.18 percent in the first half of 2026, and the figure is not a rounding trick. The National Statistics Office of Vietnam (NSO; Cục Thống kê), formerly the General Statistics Office (GSO) before its name change in 2025, recorded 7.94 percent growth in the first quarter and 8.39 percent in the second, the strongest second-quarter rate since 2011, against 7.63 percent in the first half of 2025. Inflation averaged 4.38 percent. Unemployment among working-age people held at 2.22 percent, and employment rose by roughly 673,000. The boom is real. The harder question is who is accumulating the factories, contracts, land and balance-sheet capacity that will have to carry the next cycle.
One Vietnam is easy to see. Registered foreign direct investment (FDI) reached $34.65 billion in the first half, up 61 percent, and disbursed FDI hit $13.03 billion, the highest first-half realization in five years. Manufacturing value added grew 10.23 percent and accounted for about a third of the economy’s value-added expansion. Goods exports rose 21 percent to $266.5 billion. The other Vietnam is the domestic firm that employs people, pays taxes and still cannot borrow because it lacks the land-use certificate that lenders want as collateral. About 914,000 small and medium enterprises, roughly 94 percent of registered firms, employ around 38.6 percent of the workforce and generate less than 20 percent of revenue and about 6.7 percent of exports. FiinGroup’s August 2026 reading found that only 8.8 percent of that SME population had an outstanding bank loan, against 47.1 percent of large enterprises. Headline growth and domestic productive ownership are no longer telling the same story.

Graph Attribute: Annual real GDP growth (%), 2019–2021 are long-published General Statistics Office rates; 2022 is the 8.12 percent figure used by the National Statistics Office in its January 2026 comparison; 2023–2025 are the published annual rates, including 8.02 percent for 2025. The first-half 2026 rate of 8.18 percent is not an annual figure and is therefore omitted. Sources: National Statistics Office releases, as reported in January and July 2026.
The 8 percent rate is a continuation, not an anomaly. Full-year growth was 8.02 percent in 2025, the second-strongest annual result in the 2011–2025 window, after a pandemic trough and a 2023 slowdown. What changed in early 2026 was the mix of demand. On the expenditure side, final consumption rose 8.15 percent, gross capital formation 15.20 percent, exports of goods and services 20.18 percent, and imports of goods and services 26.44 percent. The country swung to a goods-trade deficit of $16.65 billion as imports climbed 33.4 percent. The statistics office itself read the import surge as a recovery in production inputs, particularly among foreign-invested enterprises (FIEs). That is a coherent cyclical story. It is also a statement about whose order books are filling.

Graph Attribute: Share of overall value-added growth, first half of 2026. Industry and construction and services each contributed roughly 47 percent, while agriculture, forestry and fishing contributed 5.66 percent. Manufacturing alone contributed 33.07 percent. Source: National Statistics Office, first-half 2026 press release.
Industry and construction grew 9.81 percent and contributed 47.2 percent of value-added growth. Services grew 8.09 percent and contributed 47.1 percent. Agriculture grew a steady 3.87 percent. The expansion was not a single-sector spike. It was, however, concentrated in activities where foreign-invested plants already dominate Vietnam’s most internationally competitive industries. In 2025, FIEs shipped $367.09 billion of goods, 77.3 percent of exports, while domestic enterprises shipped just under $107.95 billion, 22.7 percent, and their exports fell 6.1 percent. The foreign-invested sector ran a surplus of nearly $49.5 billion; the domestic sector ran a deficit of $29.4 billion. A later report citing Vietnamese trade data put the foreign-invested share of exports at 80.1 percent in January–July 2026. Even if that later reading is revised, the direction is not in dispute.

Graph Attribute: Share of goods exports by ownership. Foreign-invested enterprises, including crude oil, accounted for 71.8 percent in 2024 and 77.3 percent in 2025; the domestic shares are the residual. Sources: Vietnamese government statistics, as cited in the U.S. State Department’s 2026 Investment Climate Statement and the National Statistics Office’s full-year 2025 trade release.
This is the divergence worth naming, and it is not the same thing as income inequality. A K-shaped pattern, used here as an analytical description rather than an official classification, is a split in productive capacity. On the upper arm sit foreign-invested manufacturers, large domestic groups with substantial land holdings and established banking relationships, and firms already embedded in electronics, machinery and other export chains. On the lower arm sit micro-enterprises, smaller manufacturers and independent service firms whose constraint is not the absence of a customer but the absence of collateral, industrial space and the managerial systems that lenders and multinational buyers both demand. Labour productivity can be written as $LP = Y/L$, with $Y$ real value added and L labour input. Aggregate $LP$ can rise because a small group of high-$Y$ plants expands, even while $LP$ inside the domestic SME population barely moves. Economy-wide labour productivity reached about VND 245 million per worker in 2025, roughly $9,809, and rose 6.83 percent at constant prices. That is a national average. It does not say that the median domestic SMEs became more productive.
The same caution applies to a divergence ratio. One can define $D_t = P_{FIE,t}/P_{SME,t}$, where each $P$ is value added per worker, and then $\Delta D = D_t - D_{t-1}$. A rising $D$ would be evidence of a widening productive gap. Vietnam does not publish a timely, ownership-consistent series that would support a clean calculation for 2026, and inventing one would be worse than omitting it. What the published record does show is a structural gap that academic work on 2011–2020 already traced largely to firm-specific factors — technology, experience, labour productivity — rather than to a single provincial governance score. The World Bank’s Vietnam work has described foreign-invested and global-value-chain firms as about 5 percent of businesses but around half of value added and employment and up to 73 percent of exports, against a domestic sector in which 98 percent of enterprises are small or informal and only 17 percent export. Those are not identical populations, and they should not be forced into one ratio. Taken together, however, they point in the same direction.
Foreign investment is not the villain of this story. It is a major reason Vietnam became one of Southeast Asia’s leading exporters of manufactured goods, a supplier of phones, computers, machinery, garments and footwear, and a plausible alternative node when firms diversified out of China. Realized FDI in manufacturing and processing was $10.76 billion in the first half of 2026, 82.6 percent of all realized FDI. Employment in industry and construction rose by about 474,100. None of that is fictitious output. The structural risk is different. If foreign plants import the technologically dense inputs, assemble or test in Vietnam, and book the design margin elsewhere, gross exports and domestic value capture diverge. An analytical approximation, not an official national-accounting identity, is
$\text{Domestic value capture}\approx \text{GDP contribution}-\text{foreign factor income}-\text{imported intermediate content}.$
Gross exports can rise while the residual stays thin. World Bank value-chain work has long described much of Vietnam’s manufacturing export success as assembly with low domestic value addition (DVA). A September 2026 discussion of the same problem put domestic value added in the relevant export measure near 39 percent, below the 40–60 percent band cited for several emerging peers. The precise index depends on the dataset and year. The mechanism does not. Samsung’s Vietnamese operations, and the electronics cluster around them, source packaging, basic plastics and lower-tier assembly from local firms more readily than they source core components. The government’s own ambition under Resolution 10 — roughly 10,000 domestic firms integrated into foreign supply chains by 2030, of which 500 to 1,000 would be first-tier suppliers, alongside a localization rate of 45–50 percent in priority industries — is an admission that the spillover is not automatic.
Finance is where the gap becomes a constraint on scaling. Outstanding credit to the economy was up 7.41 percent by 26 June 2026, slower than the 8.3 percent rise a year earlier and slower than real GDP. The aggregate number is not the indictment. The allocation is. FiinGroup’s count implies that nearly nine in ten SMEs have no recorded bank loan, and that loan access slipped 0.5 percentage point from 2025. Closure rates in 2025 were 22.7 percent for micro-enterprises, 12.7 percent for small and medium firms, and 4.9 percent for large firms. Banks that price that differential are not inventing a risk. They are also reproducing it. A firm whose main assets are contracts and cash flows cannot pledge the land-use right that still anchors much of Vietnamese secured lending. Decision 1809/QĐ-TTg, approved by the prime minister, sets a target of at least 300,000 SMEs with bank credit by 2030. The target is a measure of the distance, not evidence that the distance has closed. Only about 0.9 percent of the SME population, or roughly 7,200 firms, moved into the large-enterprise category in the FiinGroup reading for 2026. A country can register more than a million enterprises and still lack a deep domestically owned corporate sector.

Graph Attribute: Share of firms with outstanding bank loans, FiinGroup, August 2026. SMEs are firms below the survey’s revenue, capital and employment thresholds, comprising about 914,000 entities; about 80,000 had outstanding loans. Some Vietnamese summaries separate micro-enterprises from small and medium-sized firms and report a higher access rate for the latter. The 8.8 percent figure is the one consistent with the published SME and loan counts. Source: FiinGroup, as reported by Vietnam News, August  27, 2026.
Land operates as a second capital market. New industrial-land leases reached about 500 hectares in the first half of 2026, up 60 percent, and occupancy held near 82 percent. Asking rents were about $143 per square metre per lease term in the north and $184 in the south, up 2.9 and 1.7 percent. The demand cited by rating analysts is expansion by electronics and semiconductor producers. Ready-built factory and warehouse take-up fell 8 percent, to about 0.9 million square metres, because newer high-tech tenants prefer raw land. That is rational for a foreign manufacturer building a multi-year line. It is a poor match for a domestic firm that needs 2,000 square metres, a shared effluent plant and a lease short enough to survive a lost order. Land policy is industrial policy whether or not it is written as one. When the scarce parcel goes to the tenant who can pre-lease at scale, the SME does not merely pay a higher rent. It postpones the machinery, the certification and the export audit that would have made it a supplier rather than a bystander.
The enterprise register captures the churn without resolving it. In the first half, 111,700 firms were newly registered, up 22.5 percent. Registered capital up 64.8 percent, but registered employees down 12.8 percent to around 515,300. Completed dissolutions rose 94.7 percent, to 24,000, with an average of about 25,200 businesses exiting the market each month. By August, completed dissolutions had reached more than 40,800, up 125.5 percent, while firms entering or re-entering the market were slightly below the year-earlier pace. Wholesale, manufacturing and construction all showed sharp rises in completed exits. More nameplates are not the same thing as more firms capable of scale. The preliminary 2026 economic census found foreign-invested capital up 83 percent from 2020, the fastest increase of any ownership group, to about VND 17,100 trillion. State capital rose 59.6 percent over the same span. Capital is accumulating. It is not accumulating, in the main, inside the firms that employ nearly two-fifths of the workforce and export less than a tenth of the goods.
A credible objection is that none of this is a policy failure, and some of it is not even a problem. Late industrializers routinely show a gap between multinational plants and domestic SMEs. Foreign factories employ people, train technicians and, with a lag, spin out suppliers. High GDP growth enlarges the domestic market. Services, not just foreign manufacturing, produced almost half of first-half value-added growth. Realized investment in the non-state sector reached VND 1,649.2 trillion, accounting for 53.0 percent of all implemented investment in the first nine months of 2026, against 30.0 percent for the state sector and 17.0 percent for the FDI. On that measure, domestic private capital formation is not a sideshow. Bank caution toward SMEs tracks observed closure rates. Sectoral composition — electronics assembly versus domestic retail and construction — can mimic an ownership gap. Infrastructure built for an industrial park eventually lowers costs for the firm next door.
Each of those points has force. None of them dissolves the ownership problem. Non-state investment includes large private groups and property development; it is not a measure of SME capital formation. The export data move the wrong way for a diffusion story: domestic goods exports fell in 2025 while foreign-invested exports rose 26 percent, and the foreign share of shipments has climbed rather than receded. Supplier linkages remain shallow enough that official policy still treats first-tier localization as a 2030 objective. A productivity gap explained by technology and experience will persist if the firms that need the technology cannot finance it and cannot get onto the industrial land where the buyers sit. The lag may be real. It is not self-closing.
Nor is there clean evidence of a conspiracy of favoritism. State firms, strategic projects and incentive-eligible foreign investors do receive land, tax and infrastructure advantages that a micro-enterprise will never see. Decree No. 20/2026/ND-CP guides a 30 percent land-rent reduction for five years in eligible activities. The investment law effective March 2026 widened preferences for semiconductors, artificial intelligence, data and green industry. That is industrial policy, and much of it is defensible. It becomes a structural bias when the same instruments have no workable equivalent for the domestic firm trying to become a qualified supplier. Preferential access and legitimate strategy are separated by whether the preference builds a domestic capability or only a foreign production platform.
The policy implication is not to slow foreign investment. It is to stop treating domestic scaling as a residual. Cash-flow lending, movable-asset collateral and a guarantee book large enough to matter would attack the constraint banks actually cite. Credit registries that include e-invoice and tax-payment histories would let a lender price a contract rather than a title deed. Industrial parks need a tranche of smaller plots and shared certified factories, not only 50-hectare ready sites for multinational tenants. Supplier-development programs tied to foreign procurement, with technical audits rather than symbolic local-content quotas, are more likely to raise domestic value added than a blanket sourcing mandate that firms will route around. Equity markets, private credit and venture capital will not replace bank lending for a 40-person machining shop, but they are the missing rung once a firm outgrows collateral. Management systems — accounts that buyers can trust, export-compliance capabilities and a second tier of professional managers — are part of the same capital stock.
The arithmetic of the official ambition makes the sequencing clear. The National Assembly’s 10 percent full-year target would, on the statistics office’s own first-half result, require something near 11.7 percent growth in the second half. That pace, if achieved, will again be led by manufacturing orders, public works and foreign disbursement. It will not, by itself, answer the stock question. Foreign capital can do the heavy lifting in a boom. It can also pause when a tariff shock, a demand dip in the United States or a relocation decision changes the investment cycle. Domestic resilience is the capacity that remains after that pause.
The first phase of Vietnam’s rise was about attracting factories, and it worked. The next phase is about Vietnamese companies becoming able to own factories, tooling, designs and brands. That sequence — foreign investment, then domestic suppliers, then domestic productivity, then domestic capital, then firms that can export under their own name — is a proposition, not a law. The 2026 evidence says the first link is intact and the second is still thin. An 8 percent economy that cannot turn entrepreneurial ability into collateral, industrial space and export contracts will keep producing impressive GDP. It will not automatically produce an economy that Vietnamese firms own.

IndraStra Global is now available on
Apple News, Google News, Feedly, Flipboard, and  WhatsApp Channel

DISCLAIMER: This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice, solicitation, or portfolio management services. However, the company, its affiliates, or contributors may hold financial interests in certain securities or markets discussed herein. Readers should conduct their own research or consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

COPYRIGHT: This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

REPUBLISH: Republish our articles online or in print for free if you follow these guidelines. https://www.indrastra.com/p/republish-us.html