“Does China has a Military Strategy?” This pertinent question has been a longstanding query based on China’s ambiguous posture in delineating its military approach. The unpredictable nature of China’s strategic intentions has been the core factor in raising the suspicion and concerns over China’s military actions- raising the red alarms of ‘China threat’. Given this opacity, decoding China’s military strategy has become the quandary of global politics.
By Amrita Jash
“Does China
has a Military Strategy?” This pertinent question has been a longstanding query
based on China’s ambiguous posture in delineating its military approach. The
unpredictable nature of China’s strategic intentions has been the core factor
in raising the suspicion and concerns over China’s military actions- raising
the red alarms of ‘China threat’. Given this opacity, decoding China’s military
strategy has become the quandary of global politics. In this view, China’s 2015
Defense White Paper does layout the blueprint of China’s military motivations.
Therefore, in this regard, to gain a perspective in calculating China’s next
move, it becomes imperative to decode the strategic rational of China’s
proclaimed ‘Military Strategy’.
Image
Attribute: China Defense White Paper , 2015, /
Source: China Daily
On 26 May, the
State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China issued the
latest Defense White Paper. Being ninth in the order since 1998, this defence
paper marks a significant departure from its eight predecessors, in terms of
adopting a concrete policy framework. Unlike being conceptualized under the
existing norm of “China’s National Defense”, the current white paper titled“China’s Military Strategy”, is the first Chinese white paper which is
exclusively premised on military strategy and thereby, provides a blueprint of
China’s strategic military thought to the world at large. Rather than solely
building on the old framework of ‘China’s threat perceptions’, the 2015
military doctrine, first of its kind, does give some transparency to China’s
long standing opaque defence policy- denominating China’s strategic intentions
by outlining a strategy that combines strategic defence with operational and
tactical offence.
In this view,
the white paper is reflective of China’s bold and confident posture in the
changing dynamics of the international system. By finally pronouncing the
direction of its military buildup, it is clear that China has also taken a
normative departure from Deng Xiaoping’s dictum of “Keeping a low profile”.
This argument stands validated as China’s such a strategic move projects its
confidence and military preparedness to ‘stick its neck out’. By pledging
“active defense” as the essence of “CPC’s military strategic thought”, the
White Paper posits China’s military intentions by clearly specifying: “We
(China) will not attack unless we are attacked, but we will surely
counterattack if attacked” and further added that “China will never seek hegemony
or expansion”.
Keeping this
context, it becomes imperative to decode the underpinnings of this grand
‘Chinese Military Strategy’. Hereby, the assessment can be done under a
three-tier framework of- context, content and scope that defines and distinguishes
the 2015 defence white paper.
First, the
context that defines the essence of this white paper. Undoubtedly, it is born
out of China’s imminent security concerns in the changing discourse of
international system. Clarifying China’s military goal to “maintain regional
and world peace”, and suggesting that “in the foreseeable future, a world war
is unlikely, and the international situation is expected to remain generally
peaceful”, the white paper outlines China’s concerns of “new threats from
hegemonism, power politics and neo-interventionism”, whereby “the world still
faces both immediate and potential threats of local wars”. Under these new
circumstances, the justifications to China’s defensive military posture is
equated by its threat calculations. In this case, the imminent security
challenges as the paper notes is posited by US “re-balancing strategy” and “its
military presence and military alliances” in Asia; Japan’s increasing
militarist posture for it “is sparing no effort to dodge the post-war mechanism,
overhauling its military and security policies”. It also mentions that “some of
its offshore neighbors take provocative actions and reinforce their military
presence on China’s reefs and islands that they have illegally occupied”-
clearly hinting at Philippines and Vietnam. Adding to this, it emphasizes on
how “some external countries are also busy meddling in South China Sea affairs”
and “maintain constant close-in air and sea surveillance and reconnaissance
against China”. Besides, it also reiterates China’s core security concerns over
“Taiwan independence”, “East Turkestan independence” and “Tibet independence”.
Second, the
content that defines China’s military strategy. Undoubtedly, the White Paper
fosters a heavy tone to Chinese military posture to realize the Chinese Dream
as it claims “[w]ithout a strong military, a country can be neither safe nor
strong”. For China’s armed forces, the primary goals are: “[to build] a strong
military”, focus on “core security needs”, build an “informationized military”
and win “informationized wars”, “deepen the reform of national defense and the
armed forces”, “build a modern system of military forces with Chinese
characteristics”, and “enhance their capabilities”to address security threats
and accomplish “diversified military tasks”. To meet these goals, the armed
forces will adhere to the principles of flexibility, mobility and
self-dependence so that “you fight your way and I fight my way”. Thereby, in
safeguarding its interests, China wants to follow a military strategy of
“active defence”, which the Chinese view to be in contrary to “proactive”
defence policies of other international actors mainly United States and Japan.
That is, Chinese military will focus on growing internationalization of its
military role under active defence. The motivation behind this “active defence”
posture is to dispel China’s military strategy from being interpreted as that
of aggressive, expansionist or interventionist.
The major
shifts undertaken in China’s defence strategy as outlined in Section IV of the
2015 white paper: The PLA Army “will continue to reorient from theater defense
to trans-theater mobility”; The PLA Navy “will gradually shift its focus from
‘offshore waters defense’ to the combination of ‘offshore waters defense’ and
‘open seas protection’” and; the PLA Air Force “will endeavor to shift its
focus from territorial air defense to both defense and offense”.
These shifts
in China’s defence policy suggest that China is shifting its focus from its
internal security and territorial integrity to that of areas beyond its
borders- that is, adopting an internationalized outlook to its defence
framework. This objective is clear from the white paper, which states that:
“With the
growth of China's national interests, its national security is more vulnerable
to international and regional turmoil, terrorism, piracy, serious natural
disasters and epidemics, and the security of overseas interests concerning
energy and resources, strategic sea lines of communication (SLOCs), as well as
institutions, personnel and assets abroad, has become an imminent issue”.
Image Attribute: China's SLOC
Bypass Routes
And lastly,
scope of the military strategy is primarily centered in the maritime domain,
that is to win “informationized local wars” by “maritime preparation for
military struggle” - wherein China wants to build a ‘blue-water navy’. This
forms the key nodal point of the 2015 defense white paper. In the row of
security concerns that disturb China’s strategic interests, thus as the white
paper declares it is a “long-standing task for China to safeguard its maritime
rights and interests”. As it is suggestive that the PLA Navy (PLAN) will imbibe
greater role in shifting its focus from “offshore water defense” to combining
it with “open seas protection”- taking a shift from defence to offence. Endowed
with an estimated 14,500 kms coastline and faced with tensions in the crucial
international waters, the white paper makes a strong pronouncement of China’s
maritime strategy by stating that: “The traditional mentality that land
outweighs sea must be abandoned, and great importance has to be attached to
managing the seas and oceans and protecting maritime rights and interests”.
This is indicative of China’s maritime posture whereby an Air Defence
Identification Zone (ADIZ) over the South China Sea (SCS) cannot be outlawed as
its ongoing reclamation activities strongly call for China’s assertive ADIZ
move in the future. Therefore, it signals a warning to the other actors in the
SCS dispute.
While what
makes the shift to the seas more imperative is China’s grand vision of “One
Belt, One Road” Initiative, wherein China’s seapower capabilities will equip it
to realize the dream of “21st Century Maritime Silk Road”- a grand vision that
challenges the western world order. The exemplary lies in China’s recent plans
to build its first overseas base in Djibouti- a strategic move to expand its
naval military capabilities in the Indian Ocean region.
Therefore, in
an overall analysis, it can thus, be construed that the 2015 defence white
paper on “China’s Military Strategy” does provide some direction in
understanding China’s future moves. It is clear that China will grow much
bigger both literally and figuratively in its strategic military capabilities
in order to secure its national interests. The significant shift is visible in
terms of moving from being a continental power to that of becoming a sea-power-
equipped with a ‘blue-water navy’. Therefore, in the near future, China’s
military muscle will experience its obtuse flexing mostly in the critical
international waters- mainly South China Sea, East China Sea and Indian Ocean. Therefore,
with the fall of events, only time can spell the way the strategy will be
played out by China in order fulfill its unparalleled ambitions.
About The
Author:
Amrita Jash
(K-5665-2015) is Editor-in-Chief of IndraStra Global and a Doctoral Candidate
at the Centre for East Asian Studies (Chinese Division), School of
International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University. Twitter ID: @amritajash
Cite This
Article:
Jash, Amrita.
"Decoding China's Defense Strategy" IndraStra 1, no. 12 (2015):
0564.http://www.indrastra.com/2015/12/FEATURED-Decoding-China-Defense-Strategy-by-Amrita-Jash-0564.html.
ISSN 2381-3652
