By IndraStra Global Business Desk
India's Goods and Services Tax system, implemented in 2017, represented a foundational shift in the nation's fiscal architecture, unifying a patchwork of central and state levies into a single framework designed to streamline collection and reduce cascading taxes. Over the ensuing years, however, the system encountered persistent challenges, including a multi-tiered rate structure that complicated compliance and generated ongoing debates within the GST Council. By 2024, discussions on rationalizing these rates had gained momentum, with a Group of Ministers tasked with examining the framework. Yet progress remained incremental, bogged down by fiscal concerns, inter-state revenue-sharing dynamics, and the need to balance simplification against revenue neutrality. The 55th GST Council meeting in late 2024, for instance, addressed minor adjustments but deferred major structural changes, leaving the four primary slabs—5 percent, 12 percent, 18 percent, and 28 percent—intact. This hesitation reflected broader economic priorities: post-pandemic recovery demanded stable revenues, estimated at over 1.86 lakh crore rupees monthly by mid-2025, while states remained wary of any erosion in their shares. Economists, drawing on data from the Reserve Bank of India, noted that the existing slabs contributed to classification disputes, with litigation volumes exceeding 1.2 lakh cases by early 2025, underscoring the administrative burden on businesses, particularly micro, small, and medium enterprises that comprised 30 percent of GDP. Despite these pressures, the Modi government maintained a measured pace, prioritizing incremental tweaks—such as easing e-invoicing thresholds in April 2025—over wholesale reform. This approach aligned with fiscal conservatism, as gross GST collections grew 9.4 percent year-on-year to 22.08 lakh crore rupees in fiscal 2024-25, providing a buffer against immediate overhauls. However, external shocks would soon alter this trajectory, compelling a reevaluation of priorities.
The re-election of Donald Trump in November 2024 set the stage for renewed trade frictions, with his administration swiftly reviving protectionist policies. Trump's first term had already imposed tariffs on Indian steel and aluminum in 2018, prompting retaliatory measures and straining bilateral ties valued at over 190 billion dollars annually. In his second term, these actions escalated dramatically. On April 9, 2025, the United States introduced a 27 percent "reciprocal" tariff on Indian goods, calibrated to mirror perceived asymmetries in India's trade barriers, which averaged 12 percent compared to the U.S. rate of 2.2 percent. This initial levy targeted a broad swath of exports, including textiles, apparel, and chemicals, sectors that accounted for roughly 20 percent of India's 87 billion dollar shipments to the U.S. in 2024. Negotiations followed, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi visiting the White House in February 2025 to advocate for a deal doubling bilateral trade to 500 billion dollars by 2030. India responded by reducing tariffs on motorcycles and whiskey and pledging increased imports of U.S. energy and defense equipment. Yet these concessions proved insufficient. By July 31, 2025, the U.S. announced a "secondary tariff" on India, penalizing its continued purchases of discounted Russian oil, which reached 52 billion dollars in 2024. Effective August 27, 2025, this added 25 percent to the baseline, culminating in a 50 percent total duty—the highest among major trading partners, surpassing even those on Brazil and exceeding rates on China by 16 percentage points.
The economic ramifications for India were profound and multifaceted. The Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) estimated that the tariffs could slash exports to the U.S. from 86.5 billion dollars in 2025 to 50 billion dollars in 2026, a 43 percent decline affecting 66 billion dollars in goods. Sectors like gems and jewelry, where 30 percent of global trade originates from India, faced existential threats; exports in this category, valued at 10.8 billion dollars to the U.S. in 2024, risked a 70 percent drop. Textiles and apparel, labor-intensive industries employing millions in states like Gujarat and Tamil Nadu, saw similar vulnerabilities, with shipments potentially falling from 60.2 billion dollars to 18.6 billion dollars. Auto parts, carpets (98 percent exported, 60 percent to the U.S.), aquaculture such as shrimp, and furniture joined the list of casualties. The Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations warned of disruptions to corporate strategies, stalling investments by firms relocating supply chains from China. Overall, the hit to GDP was projected at 0.5 to 1 percentage point, with Fitch Ratings affirming India's 'BBB' outlook but forecasting growth moderation to 5.8 percent in fiscal 2025-26 and 5.4 percent in 2026-27 absent countermeasures. Unemployment risks loomed large, particularly in export-dependent regions, where small enterprises—lacking the scale of Vietnamese or Bangladeshi competitors—faced 30 to 35 percent cost disadvantages. The rupee depreciated 3 percent against the dollar by August 2025, exacerbating import costs for oil and raw materials. Broader ripple effects included stalled foreign direct investment, with inflows dipping 15 percent in the first half of 2025, and heightened currency volatility that deterred portfolio flows. Analysts at UBS quantified the vulnerable basket at 8 billion dollars, emphasizing that while U.S.-bound exports constituted only 2 percent of India's GDP, the concentrated impact on key industries amplified the pain. The Confederation of Indian Industry projected 5 to 7 million job losses if diversification lagged, underscoring the urgency for domestic offsets.
Within this context, the Modi government's pivot to GST rationalization emerged not as an isolated fiscal exercise but as a calibrated response to external vulnerabilities. Discussions on reform, ongoing since the GoM's formation in 2024, accelerated post the April tariffs. By August 15, 2025, during his Independence Day address from the Red Fort, Prime Minister Modi explicitly committed to "next-generation" GST changes by Diwali, framing them as a means to reduce burdens on daily-use items and ease compliance for MSMEs. "The government will roll out next-generation GST reforms by Diwali 2025, with a focus on reducing taxes on daily-use items and easing compliance for MSMEs," he stated, linking the initiative to broader economic resilience. This announcement, timed amid tariff escalations, marked a departure from prior caution. The 56th GST Council meeting on September 3, 2025, under Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, formalized the blueprint: abolition of the 12 percent and 28 percent slabs, consolidation into 5 percent for essentials and 18 percent for most goods and services, and a new 40 percent rate for luxury and sin items like tobacco, pan masala, aerated drinks, high-end vehicles, yachts, and private aircraft. Tobacco products retained 28 percent plus cess temporarily, pending compensation repayments. Effective September 22, 2025—the eve of Navratri—the changes exempted life and health insurance from 18 percent GST entirely, slashed rates on small cars, air conditioners, televisions, toothpaste, shampoo, and processed foods like bhujia, namkeen, and packaged juices to 5 or 18 percent, and zero-rated items including paneer, Indian breads, and life-saving drugs. Cement shifted from 28 percent to 18 percent, bolstering construction, while apparel, footwear, farm machinery, and auto components benefited from softened prices.
The rollout's mechanics revealed a deliberate strategy to mitigate tariff-induced losses. Pre-filled returns and automated refunds streamlined compliance, reducing errors and freeing working capital for MSMEs, which had faced 45-day payment mandates under prior rules. Manufacturers, packers, and importers received until December 31, 2025, to revise maximum retail prices on unsold stock via stamping or stickering, ensuring pass-through of benefits without overwriting originals. The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal's operationalization by December 2025 promised faster dispute resolution, addressing the 1.2 lakh pending cases. Fiscal modeling underpinned the design: while the reforms entailed a 20 billion dollar annual revenue shortfall—equivalent to 1.6 percent of GDP when combined with April's income tax relief—the State Bank of India projected a 5.31 lakh crore rupee consumption injection, neutralizing the drag through a multiplier effect. UBS economists noted that, unlike corporate or income tax cuts, GST reductions "directly affect consumption at the point of purchase, potentially leading to higher consumer spending." Indeed, with inflation at 1.55 percent in July 2025 and household spending resilient at 6.9 percent year-on-year, the changes targeted the 60 percent consumption-driven GDP component. Kotak Mutual Fund anticipated reshaped dynamics in essentials, electronics, and automobiles, with Maruti Suzuki slashing small car prices by up to 1.29 lakh rupees and FMCG firms like Amul and ITC passing on 7 to 13 percent savings on groceries, stationery, clothing, and medicines.
Evidence from the initial implementation phase corroborates these projections. On September 22, daily essentials and food items declined in price, with FMCG companies effecting cuts ahead of the festive season. Automobile demand surged, with industry bodies forecasting a 2.4 trillion rupee stimulus for autos and durables. The Confederation of Indian Industry termed the measures "people-centric," while FICCI President Harsha Vardhan Agarwal observed that "the streamlined tax structure, combined with a renewed emphasis on Swadeshi, as outlined by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi, will support domestic production and manufacturing, in keeping with the vision of Aatmanirbhar and Viksit Bharat." Prime Minister Modi's September 21 address reinforced this linkage, declaring the reforms the onset of a "GST Savings Festival" benefiting the poor, middle class, youth, women, and traders. "Your savings will go up and you can buy your favourite items easily," he said, emphasizing equitable state participation and investment attraction. Union Home Minister Amit Shah echoed this, calling it a "gift of Next Gen GST reform to all the mothers and sisters of the country on the auspicious occasion of Navratri." Even as opposition voices, like Congress's Jairam Ramesh, critiqued the timing and adequacy—accusing the government of rendering the National Anti-Profiteering Authority "toothless" via a September 30, 2024, notification—the data pointed to tangible offsets. India's Q1 2025-26 GDP expanded 7.8 percent, exceeding expectations, with the Reserve Bank of India revising its full-year forecast to 6.8 percent, attributing partial resilience to GST rationalization countering tariff headwinds.
Yet the interplay between tariffs and reforms exposes underlying tensions in India's economic model. The 50 percent duties, rooted in geopolitical grievances over Russian oil—India's largest supplier post-Ukraine invasion—underscore the limits of strategic autonomy. While exempting pharmaceuticals (critical for U.S. generics) and electronics mitigated some fallout, the non-exempt basket's exposure remained acute. Nomura likened the effective rate to a "trade embargo," eroding competitiveness against lower-tariff peers like Vietnam. Domestically, the reforms' 13 to 20 billion dollar cost necessitated compensatory mechanisms, including phased implementation and surplus tax collections from formalization. The International Monetary Fund, revising India's 2025 growth to 6.6 percent, cited "boldness of their reforms" but cautioned on 2026 moderation due to persistent tariffs. Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva praised the GST modifications alongside digital payments and Aadhaar, positioning India as a "key growth engine" in global recovery. Still, diversification challenges persist: while free trade agreements with the UAE, Australia, and ongoing EU talks offer avenues, redirecting 43 percent of U.S.-bound flows demands infrastructure and policy agility. Rural insulation, as Pidilite's Sudhanshu Vats noted, stems from low inflation and agricultural incomes, but urban exporters in Gujarat—Modi's home state—bear disproportionate brunt.
Critically, the reforms' success hinges on execution amid dual pressures. Short-term liquidity strains for exporters and MSMEs during transitions, coupled with petroleum's ongoing exclusion from GST, perpetuate structural gaps. The 40 percent sin tax, while revenue-balancing, risks evasion in informal sectors. Broader implications extend to global alignments: strained U.S. ties may accelerate BRICS engagement, with Jeffrey Sachs critiquing Trump's tariffs as a "strategic error" isolating America and drawing India closer to multipolar forums. Jake Sullivan's September 2025 rebuke of Trump for weakening India-U.S. relations further illustrates diplomatic costs. Domestically, the push for swadeshi—echoed in Modi's call for "India’s prosperity will gain its strength from Swadeshi mantra"—aligns with Production-Linked Incentives and credit infusions, fostering self-reliance. Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw affirmed that the changes would "help households save money," while Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri dismissed opposition critiques as ineffective. Bloomberg reported rural buoyancy, with demand driven by agricultural stability, suggesting segmented resilience.
In dissecting this episode, the GST 2.0 rollout exemplifies adaptive policymaking under duress. Pre-tariff inertia yielded to post-August urgency, transforming a stalled agenda into a consumption catalyst. Data from the first month post-September 22 indicate 7 to 18 percent savings across categories, spurring festive sales and easing inflation pass-through. Jefferies projected a 0.6 percentage point GDP uplift, aligning with SBI's 1.6 percent stimulus estimate. Yet balance requires acknowledging risks: if tariffs endure, growth forecasts may undershoot, per Fitch's 5.4 percent 2026-27 projection. Revenue shortfalls, though offset by 9.4 percent collections growth, demand vigilant monitoring, especially as states eye compensation extensions. The reforms also invite scrutiny on equity: while essentials benefit, luxury hikes may disproportionately affect aspirational consumers. Opposition demands for five-year compensation renewal highlight federal frictions, unresolved in the 56th meeting.
Ultimately, this convergence of external compulsion and internal recalibration reveals the fragility of open economies in a protectionist resurgence. India's response—leveraging domestic levers to blunt global shocks—preserves momentum, with Q1 2025-26's 7.8 percent expansion defying headwinds. As Chief Economic Adviser V. Anantha Nageswaran affirmed, the economy's "strength will carry us through these times." The trajectory forward depends on negotiation outcomes, diversification efficacy, and reform fidelity. In a landscape where macroeconomic variables eclipse trade policy in shaping imbalances, per the World Trade Organization, India's emphasis on internal vigor positions it for sustained, if tempered, expansion. The GST evolution, born of necessity, thus not only addresses immediate perils but recalibrates the fiscal compass for a more insulated future.
IndraStra Global is now available on
Apple News, Google News, Feedly, Flipboard, and WhatsApp Channel
Apple News, Google News, Feedly, Flipboard, and WhatsApp Channel
COPYRIGHT: This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
REPUBLISH: Republish our articles online or in print for free if you follow these guidelines. https://www.indrastra.com/p/republish-us.html
.jpg)
