By IndraStra Global News Team
The Hinduja Group-owned IndusInd Bank, one of India’s prominent private-sector lenders, has found itself at a crossroads in early 2025. A staggering ₹2,100 crore ($245.92 million) pre-tax hit to its earnings, stemming from misvalued foreign exchange hedging strategies, has shaken investor confidence and drawn scrutiny to its operational and governance frameworks. This financial misstep, revealed in March 2025, coincides with broader questions about the bank’s business engagements with Russia following the Ukraine invasion in February 2022. As geopolitical tensions reshaped global trade and finance, IndusInd’s exposure to Russian markets—however limited—may have amplified the risks tied to its foreign currency dealings. At the time of writing, the bank has not specified which department is accountable, though most experts believe the responsibility likely lies with the treasury or global markets division.
The Hinduja Group, a sprawling conglomerate with interests spanning automotive, energy, and finance, has long maintained a global footprint. IndusInd Bank, its flagship financial arm, has mirrored this ambition by catering to a diverse clientele, including corporates with international dealings. While the bank has not publicly disclosed extensive direct exposure to Russia, its involvement in trade finance, foreign currency transactions, and correspondent banking networks suggests it could not entirely escape the ripple effects of the Ukraine conflict. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Western sanctions severed Moscow from much of the global financial system, including the SWIFT network. Indian banks, including private players like IndusInd, faced a delicate balancing act: capitalizing on opportunities to facilitate trade with Russia—often in rupees or alternative currencies—while navigating sanctions-related risks. Reports from The Economic Times and The Hindu in 2023 highlighted how Indian banks stepped in to process payments for oil, fertilizers, and other commodities from Russia, filling a void left by Western institutions. With its robust treasury operations and expertise in forex transactions, IndusInd likely participated in this ecosystem, albeit cautiously.
However, engaging with Russia came with inherent volatility. The ruble’s wild fluctuations and restricted access to dollar-based hedging instruments posed significant challenges for banks managing foreign currency exposures. A March 2025 report from Mint noted that IndusInd’s treasury desk had historically relied on internal derivatives trades to hedge its forex borrowings and deposits—a practice that became riskier in a post-invasion world where currency markets grew unpredictable. If IndusInd’s dealings with Russian counterparties or clients increased its reliance on such hedges, it may have inadvertently sown the seeds for the misvaluation crisis that erupted in 2025.
The immediate trigger for IndusInd’s current woes lies in its foreign exchange hedging strategies, which unraveled spectacularly in early 2025. On March 10, the bank disclosed “discrepancies” in its derivatives portfolio, estimating a 2.35% hit to its net worth—translating to ₹1,520 crore net of taxes, or roughly ₹2,100 crore pre-tax, according to The Financial Express. This figure, pegged by analysts at ICICI Securities and others, reflects years of underestimating hedging costs tied to foreign currency borrowings and deposits. Media reports paint a troubling picture. The Financial Express detailed how IndusInd’s internal review, spurred by the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) updated guidelines on investment portfolios in September 2023, exposed flaws in its accounting of derivatives over a five-to-seven-year period. Unlike peers who typically outsourced hedging to external agencies, IndusInd relied heavily on internal swaps between its treasury and asset-liability management desks. These trades, often involving low-liquidity instruments like yen deposits or long-term dollar borrowings, were valued differently from external contracts—marked to market externally but swapped internally at outdated rates. When RBI norms tightened in April 2024, mandating stricter compliance, the cracks became undeniable.
The fallout was swift. On March 11, IndusInd’s stock plummeted 27%, wiping out ₹19,000 crore in market capitalization in a single day, as reported by The Economic Times. Brokerages like Nuvama and Emkay Global downgraded the stock, citing weak internal controls and governance lapses. CEO Sumant Kathpalia, in a late-night analyst call, admitted the discrepancies had accumulated over years, going unnoticed despite multiple audits—a revelation that stunned investors and regulators alike. But how does Russia fit into this? The connection may lie in the bank’s forex exposure profile. IndusInd’s borrowings from multilateral agencies and foreign deposits, often denominated in dollars or yen, required hedging against rupee depreciation. Post-Ukraine invasion, as India-Russia trade surged—reaching $65 billion in 2024 per Reuters—banks like IndusInd likely saw increased activity in forex transactions linked to Russian clients or intermediaries. The ruble’s volatility and restricted hedging options could have strained the bank’s internal models, exacerbating misvaluations. While no direct evidence ties the ₹2,100 crore hit to Russia-specific trades, the geopolitical context likely heightened the risks of an already flawed strategy.
IndusInd’s troubles extend beyond numbers; they spotlight governance and leadership vulnerabilities. The RBI’s decision to extend Kathpalia’s tenure by just one year—against the board’s three-year proposal—signaled unease, as noted by India Today. This move, announced days before the hedging disclosure, compounded investor jitters. Kathpalia himself hinted at RBI discomfort with his leadership, telling analysts, “They are uncomfortable with my skills in running the bank, and we have to respect that.” The timing couldn’t be worse. The bank’s CFO resigned before Q3 earnings, and its microfinance portfolio has faced asset quality stress, with a 40% profit drop in September 2024 (New Indian Express). Add to this the derivatives mess, and IndusInd appears beset by systemic issues. Reuters reported that the RBI is now reviewing forex exposures across banks, a move triggered by IndusInd’s disclosure. If the bank’s Russian engagements—however peripheral—contributed to its risk appetite, they may have indirectly strained an already fragile governance framework.
Promoter Ashok Hinduja sought to reassure investors, telling ETNow that the group would inject capital if needed. Yet, his assertion that “these are normal routine problems” rings hollow against a 58% stock decline over the past year (Moneycontrol). While a strength, the Hinduja Group’s global outlook may have overexposed IndusInd to volatile markets like Russia, testing its risk management mettle. IndusInd’s saga offers valuable lessons for India’s banking sector, highlighting the perils of internal hedging amid geopolitical upheaval. Banks must therefore recalibrate their risk models for a world where sanctions and currency shocks are the norm. Russia’s isolation has forced Indian lenders to innovate—think rupee-rouble trade mechanisms—but innovation without robust controls is a recipe for disaster.
It also highlights the RBI’s growing scrutiny of private banks. IndusInd isn’t alone; peers like Yes Bank and RBL have faced similar reckonings. The regulator’s push for transparency, evident in its 2023 guidelines, aims to curb such lapses, but enforcement remains a challenge. Finally, it questions the sustainability of aggressive global strategies by Indian banks. IndusInd’s Russian foray, even if modest, reflects a broader trend of tapping sanction-hit markets. While this can yield short-term gains—India’s oil imports from Russia soared post-invasion—it demands sophisticated risk management that IndusInd clearly lacked.
IndusInd insists it can absorb the ₹2,100 crore hit without raising capital, with Kathpalia projecting a Q4 profit (Reuters). An external audit, due by April 2025, will clarify the damage. Yet, rebuilding trust will take longer. The stock, trading at public-sector multiples, reflects deep skepticism. A leadership transition looms, with Kathpalia’s truncated tenure ending in March 2026. The Russia angle, while speculative, merits scrutiny. If IndusInd’s forex book tilted toward volatile markets post-invasion, it may have misjudged the cascading risks. Media reports in vernacular language portals such as Dainik Bhaskar and ABP Asmita echo English outlets in questioning the bank’s opacity, amplifying public distrust.
Undoubtedly, the Bank’s current hedging misstep is more than a financial blunder—it’s a cautionary tale of ambition outpacing prudence. Its Russian engagements, though not the sole culprit, likely magnified vulnerabilities in a turbulent global landscape. As the bank weathers this crisis, its future will measure the strength of India’s private banking sector and the Hinduja Group’s capacity to guide it back toward stability.
Apple News, Google News, Feedly, Flipboard, and WhatsApp Channel
