At a time that an Arab coalition led by Saudi Arabia has not been able to achieve its goals in the war on Yemen during the past 10 months, officials in Riyadh recently announced their country’s readiness to deploy ground forces to Syria. Although the proposal to send 150,000 troops to Syria by Saudi Arabia’s Arab allies was enticing to the US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter, for a few reasons which will be enumerated below, there are serious doubts about accepting this proposal.
By Hossein
Kebriaeezadeh
(via IranReview.org)
At a time that
an Arab coalition led by Saudi Arabia has not been able to achieve its goals in
the war on Yemen during the past 10 months, officials in Riyadh recently
announced their country’s readiness to deploy ground forces to Syria. Although
the proposal to send 150,000 troops to Syria by Saudi Arabia’s Arab allies was
enticing to the US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter, for a few reasons which will
be enumerated below, there are serious doubts about accepting this proposal.
Reactions
shown by various political circles to this piece of news have been different. A
group of political observers and centers of power, including in Tehran, have
noted that this proposal by Saudi officials is just a show of power and
military bragging aimed at achieving political goals at the current juncture
that Syria peace talks have been aborted and, therefore, it is no more than a
simple political bluff. Another group of analysts, however, take into account
the political and decision-making structure in Saudi Arabia, which is
individual-oriented and non-institutional, concluding that similar to the war
waged against Yemen, it is quite possible. They maintain that impulsiveness is
now a regular feature of political decision-making process in Saudi Arabia and,
therefore, the decision-making process in this country is accompanied with high
risks and miscalculations. To bring an example in support of this claim, they
point out Saudi Arabia’s support for extremist groups, which finally led to
rise of Daesh and the impossibility of containing the new mutated form of
terrorism.
In the
meantime, war conditions in Syria have reached a stage in which there is no way
for making mistakes even at tactical level for any one of the belligerent sides
and, therefore, it is totally different from Yemen where only a Saudi-led
coalition is engaged in the war.
According to
Riyadh's regional policy, which is mostly defined and implemented on the basis
of countering Iran’s regional policies, dispatching ground forces to Syria war
fronts is considered as a last-ditch effort to push Iran back in Syria. Being
aware of the importance that Syria has for Iran, in particular, and for the
resistance axis, in general, Saudi Arabia is trying to regain the upper hand
that it has lost in Syria by implementing this policy.
Of course, it
must not be ignored that in doing this, Saudi Arabia is also pursuing other
goals. At the domestic level, we know that this country is not in good shape.
The power struggle within the royal family is going on while economic and civil
discontent in addition to discrimination has greatly increased in this rich
country compared to any time before. Therefore, by resorting to adventurism
beyond its borders, King Salman is trying to somehow maintain social solidarity
in his country and postpone as long as he can the breakout of possible domestic
political conflicts.
At
international level, Riyadh may be able to somehow wash its hands of
accusations that it has been supporting extremist efforts, which have largely
marred its global image. Saudi Arabia has made dispatching its ground forces to
Syria conditional on the acceptance of the United States as part of the US-led
coalition against Daesh. Therefore, by doing this, Riyadh is planning not only
to be directly present in Syria and gain more legitimacy, but also to galvanize
the Western front into taking more decisive action against Tehran-Moscow axis.
On the one
hand, at regional level, Saudi Arabia would be starting a new game against the
resistance axis and its traditional rival, Iran, by sending 150,000 Sunni Arab
soldiers to Syria. Playing the sectarian and religious cards in the region may
perpetuate conflicts in the Middle East, but for Saudi Arabia and political
currents supported by this country in Syria, it will buy time, which is among
important factors in this war.
On the other
hand, following engagement of Russia, the war in Syria has entered a sensitive
and determining phase. Advances on the ground by Syrian President Bashar
Assad’s forces in such strategic regions as Dara’a and Aleppo have changed
conditions in favor of Iran – Russia axis. Knowing this, Saudi Arabia, which is
afraid of post-war conditions, is ready to take any risk even if it would lead
to direct confrontation between pro- and anti-Assad fronts. Although direct
confrontation between these two fronts needs special conditions whose
possibility is quite low right now, remarks made by Russian prime minister about
the possibility of a third world war in case of Saudi Arabia’s ground troops
deployment to Syria are noteworthy.
Of course, the
contemporary world is no more ready and is not unwise enough to undertake the
costs of a new war on global scale, but regionalization of conflicts around
ethnic and religious fault lines can be a possible cost of this strategic
mistake. The high potential that exists in the Middle East for flare-up of this
form of hostilities, which are usually extremely bloody, incontrollable and
long-term, makes it necessary for the United States to look at Riyadh's
proposal more cautiously.
On the other
hand, extremist forces, who have already felt the heat of global community’s
hatred against them following terror attacks in Paris, will become more hopeful
in receiving support from their financial backer and will find conditions
suitable to regroup, recruit new forces and change their tactic.
On the whole,
dispatching ground forces to Syria by Saudi Arabia will not necessarily lead to
a third world war. However, if any one of the aforesaid possible scenarios and
consequences of Saudi Arabia’s troops deployment to Syria – that is, direct war
between two fronts in Syria, regionalization of tensions, or remarkable
invigoration of extremist groups – is realized, the Middle East, and
subsequently the entire world would see a new face of ethnic and religious
hostilities as well as human crises for, at least, the next two decades to
come.
Key Words: Saudi
Arabia, Military Deployment, Syria, Arab Coalition, Daesh, Regional Policy,
Iran, Domestic Level, International Level, Regional Level, Russia, Dara’a,
Aleppo, Middle East, Third World War, Ethnic Hostilities, Kebriaeezadeh
More By
Hossein Kebriaeezadeh:
*Riyadh-Washington
Relations: From Classic Dependence to Asymmetrical Dependence:http://www.iranreview.org/content/Documents/Riyadh-Washington-Relations-From-Classic-Dependence-to-Asymmetrical-Dependence.htm
*(Persian)
Gulf Cooperation Council, Riyadh’s Inefficient Tool for Isolating Iran:http://www.iranreview.org/content/Documents/-Persian-Gulf-Cooperation-Council-Riyadh-s-Inefficient-Tool-for-Isolating-Iran.htm
*A
Glance at Future Prospects of Turkish-Saudi Strategic Cooperation Council:http://www.iranreview.org/content/Documents/A-Glance-at-Future-Prospects-of-Turkish-Saudi-Strategic-Cooperation-Council.htm
Please note
that this article represents the view of the author(s) alone and not IndraStra
Global.
