Airstrikes and Prisoners Swap: The Ukraine–Russia War’s Diplomatic Paradox

By IndraStra Global Editorial Team

The war in Ukraine, now stretching into its fourth year, has reached a grim crescendo with Russia’s recent barrage of nearly 370 missiles and drones, one of the largest air assaults of the conflict, claiming at least 12 lives and injuring dozens across Ukrainian regions. This devastating attack, coupled with the simultaneous completion of a historic prisoner swap, encapsulates the paradox of the current moment: a flicker of diplomatic progress overshadowed by relentless violence. The assault, described by Ukraine’s air force as involving 69 ballistic and cruise missiles and 298 attack drones, clearly reveals Moscow’s apparent disinterest in a truce, even as both sides engage in rare moments of negotiation. The war’s toll—on civilians, infrastructure, and the faint hope for peace—demands a sober examination of the dynamics driving this escalation and the faltering efforts to end it.
The overnight strikes on May 25, 2025, painted a harrowing picture of destruction across Ukraine. According to The New York Times, in the southern city of Mykolaiv, an apartment building’s roof was obliterated, its beams exposed like broken ribs. In Markhalivka, near Kyiv, entire streets were consumed by fire, with debris littering the pavement and the smell of burning lingering in the air. In Zhytomyr, rescuers pulled the bodies of three children—aged eight, 12, and 17—from the rubble of their homes. The human cost was stark: four deaths in the Kyiv region, four in Khmelnytsky, and one in Mykolaiv, with over 60 injuries and more than 80 residential buildings damaged across 13 regions. Anzhelika Krasovets, a 49-year-old resident of Markhalivka, recounted the terror of being trapped under debris with her husband and three children, miraculously surviving as shelling continued. “We pulled the children out ourselves; I don’t know how we managed it,” she said, her voice a testament to resilience amid chaos. Her neighbor, however, was not so fortunate, his body “torn apart and covered in blood,” as Henadii Shvets, a 72-year-old survivor, described.
This escalation follows a pattern of intensified Russian attacks, including a strike last month that killed 53 civilians near a playground and city center. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha called it “a difficult Sunday morning in Ukraine after a sleepless night” following “the most massive Russian air attack in many weeks.” The scale of the assault, with two-thirds of missiles and nearly all drones intercepted, highlights Ukraine’s defensive capabilities, bolstered by Western-provided F-16 jets and missile defense systems. Yet, the sheer volume of Russia’s arsenal overwhelmed these defenses, leaving civilians to bear the brunt. President Volodymyr Zelensky, undeterred, used the attacks to renew his call for international pressure on Moscow. “The world may go on a weekend break, but the war continues, regardless of weekends or weekdays,” he wrote on social media. “This cannot be ignored. Silence of America, silence of others around the world only encourage Putin.”
On the other side, Russia’s Defense Ministry claimed its strikes targeted Ukrainian military-production facilities, a justification that rings hollow against the backdrop of shattered homes and civilian deaths. Moscow also reported intercepting 110 Ukrainian drones, with 12 downed near the capital, prompting restrictions at four Russian airports, including Sheremetyevo. The Kremlin’s narrative, however, is complicated by its own vulnerabilities. A reported Ukrainian drone strike on May 20, during President Vladimir Putin’s visit to Kursk, allegedly targeted his helicopter, an incident Russia’s air defense commander Yuriy Dashkin described as an “unprecedented attack.” The drone was neutralized, and Putin’s convoy proceeded uninterrupted, but the event raised questions about whether Kyiv intended an assassination attempt or a psychological operation. The incident, coupled with Ukraine’s earlier incursion into Kursk—where it seized 500 square miles before being largely repelled—reveals the war’s cross-border reach and the risks both sides are willing to take.
Amid this violence, a rare diplomatic achievement emerged: the largest prisoner exchange of the war, with each side releasing 1,000 detainees over three days, concluding on May 25. The swap, negotiated in Istanbul earlier this month, marked the first direct talks between Russia and Ukraine since the war’s early months. Zelensky and the Russian Defense Ministry confirmed the release of 303 additional prisoners each on Sunday, following 390 the previous day. This exchange, while a small victory, stands as the only tangible outcome of recent cease-fire negotiations, which have otherwise stalled. Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov indicated Moscow would present a draft peace document, but Ukrainian officials expect it to reiterate unacceptable demands, such as territorial concessions. For many Ukrainians, like Oksana Ivenuk in Markhalivka, who wept as she surveyed her damaged home, Russia’s talk of peace feels like a cruel feint. "We’re extremely exhausted after all these years of war," she told Daria Mitiuk of The New York Times, her tears echoing the fatigue of a nation under siege.
The international response has been a mix of condemnation and caution. US Special Envoy to Ukraine Keith Kellogg called the latest Russian attacks “a clear violation” of the 1977 Geneva Peace Protocols, urging an immediate ceasefire. Germany’s Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, speaking to ARD, advocated for additional EU sanctions, stating, “Putin is not interested in peace, he wants to continue this war, and we must not allow this.” Yet, the silence Zelensky decries is palpable. President Trump, who has oscillated between pressuring Russia and stepping back, issued a sharp rebuke of Putin, writing in a post on Truth Social, “He has gone absolutely CRAZY! He is needlessly killing a lot of people, and I’m not just talking about soldiers. Missiles and drones are being shot into Cities in Ukraine, for no reason whatsoever.” But Trump’s criticism extended to Zelensky, accusing him of “doing his Country no favors by talking the way he does.” This ambivalence reflects Trump’s broader retreat from direct involvement, as he told Zelensky last week that Russia and Ukraine must resolve the conflict themselves, a stance solidified after a two-hour call with Putin where he endorsed direct Kyiv-Moscow talks.
This shift in US policy is a blow to Ukraine, which has relied on Western support to counter Russia’s aggression. Trump’s earlier threats to sanction Russia if it refused a 30-day ceasefire have faded, with reports indicating he now believes Putin thinks he is winning—a view that aligns with Russia’s recent territorial gains, such as the capture of Romanivka in Donetsk. Putin’s confidence was on display during his visit to Kursk, his first since Russian forces, aided by North Korean troops, reclaimed most of the region from Ukraine’s August incursion. The Kremlin framed the visit as a return to normalcy, with Putin promising $800 monthly stipends to border residents and meeting volunteers like Yevgeny Karachevtsev, a priest who told him, “We are preparing for a peaceful life.” Yet, the reality in Kursk—where nearly 300 civilians died and 110,000 were displaced—belies this narrative. The war’s toll on Russian civilians, though less reported, mirrors Ukraine’s suffering, puncturing Moscow’s portrayal of the conflict as a distant operation.
Ukraine’s own escalation, including drone strikes on Russian military-industrial targets, shows its determination to fight back despite the asymmetry in firepower. A factory producing ballistic missile parts was among the targets, a move that underscores Kyiv’s strategy to disrupt Russia’s war machine. However, these attacks have caused far fewer civilian casualties than Russia’s, a disparity that fuels Ukraine’s moral argument but does little to close the gap in military capacity. Zelensky’s plea for “resolve” from the US and Europe—targeting Russia’s economic “weak points” through sanctions—reflects the understanding that military might alone cannot end the war. “Resolve is important right now—the resolve of the United States, the resolve of European countries, of all those in the world that want peace,” he said, framing sanctions as a path to pressure Moscow into meaningful negotiations.
The prisoner swap, while a fleeting success, highlights the narrow space for diplomacy in a conflict defined by intransigence. Russia’s insistence on conditions like Ukrainian withdrawal from contested territories, rejected outright by Kyiv, suggests that talks remain a tactical maneuver rather than a genuine pursuit of peace. For Ukraine, the war is existential, a fight for survival against a neighbor bent on subjugation. For Russia, it is a gamble to reassert influence, even at the cost of international isolation and domestic discontent, as seen in Kursk’s displaced communities and the arrest of a former governor for embezzling defense funds. The human stories (which are shared by The New York Times)—Anzhelika Krasovets saving her children, Henadii Shvets mourning his neighbor—cut through the strategic posturing, reminding us that civilians on both sides pay the steepest price.
The war’s trajectory hinges on whether the international community can muster the resolve Zelensky demands. Sanctions, as Wadephul suggests, could tighten the screws on Russia’s economy, but their impact depends on unified action, which has been inconsistent. Trump’s wavering, Putin’s recalcitrance, and Ukraine’s defiance form a volatile triangle, with no side willing to yield enough for a breakthrough. The prisoner exchange proves that dialogue is possible, but the scale of Russia’s latest attacks and the audacity of Ukraine’s drone strikes suggest both sides are doubling down. As Zelensky warned, silence only emboldens Putin, yet the world’s response remains muted, caught between outrage and indecision. For now, Ukraine endures, its people pulling each other from the rubble, while the prospect of peace remains as fragile as the homes shattered in Markhalivka.
With reporting by Al Jazeera, The Guardian, NDTV, TASS, The New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal

IndraStra Global is now available on
Apple News, Google News, Feedly, Flipboard, and  WhatsApp Channel

COPYRIGHT: This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

REPUBLISH: Republish our articles online or in print for free if you follow these guidelines. https://www.indrastra.com/p/republish-us.html